The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts
Identifieur interne : 000157 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000156; suivant : 000158The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts
Auteurs : Sheila MorrisseySource :
- Library Hi Tech [ 0737-8831 ] ; 2010-06-15.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Academic resources, Accessing software, Artifact, Best guarantor, Careful assessment, Case study, Computer science, Considerable cost savings, Corporate sponsors, Development environment, Different tool, Digital, Digital artifact, Digital heritage, Digital preservation, Digital preservation community, Digital preservation service, Digital preservation space, Digital stewardship, Domain knowledge, Economical solution, Effective knowledge, English literature, Feature extraction, Foss, Foss tool, Foss tools, Free software, Free software foundation, Harvard business school, Individual foss tool, Ithaka, January, Jhove2, Jhove2 framework, Jhove2 project, Linux, Linux foundation, Markup language, Network effect, Open software, Open source, Open source community, Open source initiative, Open source software, Open source software tools, Particular obligation, Portico, Preservation arsenal, Proprietary, Proprietary software, Proprietary tools, Research output report, Revenue models, Sgml, Sgml applications, Software, Software developers, Software engineering, Software tools, Source code, Sustainability, Tribal knowledge.
Abstract
Purpose Free and open source software FOSS brings many benefits to digital preservation however it is not free. If the context in which free and open source software tools are created and employed is examined, it becomes clear that the sustainability of any software FOSS, custom or commercial to ensure the preservation of the digital heritage will depend on careful assessment of, and provision for, the costs implicit and explicit entailed in the production and continued employment of these tools. The purpose of this paper is to focus on FOSS and archiving of the digital heritage. Designmethodologyapproach Portico, a notforprofit digital preservation service, explores the costs of FOSS based on its experiences as a working archive with an extremely long time horizon. Findings There are considerable benefits to FOSS, including its openness and the broadbased testing of it in realworld situations. FOSS tools can provide considerable cost savings over proprietary tools. However, FOSS is neither free to use, nor to create, nor to maintain. Digital preservation organizations must inventory not only the FOSS tools in the preservation arsenal, but the network of sustaining tools FOSS and otherwise, documentation, and tribal knowledge that make these tools effectively usable. The risks to sustainability of this network of resources must be assessed, and determine what it will cost to keep them viable. Strategies will have to be considered and implemented for providing the means to sustain these resources. An engaged community of use is the best guarantor of the vitality of any FOSS tool. As that community wanes, it becomes even more essential to capture the significant properties and domain knowledge about that tool. Creators of new software in the digital preservation space have a particular obligation to provide and maintain information about the significant properties of that software. Originalityvalue The paper shows how Portico brings its practical experiences integrating multiple FOSS tools to bear on an analysis of the costs to creating and maintaining these tools over the longterm.
Url:
DOI: 10.1108/07378831011047622
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001535
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001086
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000119
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000157
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000157
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Morrissey, Sheila" sort="Morrissey, Sheila" uniqKey="Morrissey S" first="Sheila" last="Morrissey">Sheila Morrissey</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:50E7A30D477D7ACEFE0AAC32B3972687C734A577</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1108/07378831011047622</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/4W2-K761XF99-W/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001535</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001535</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001086</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000119</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000119</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0737-8831:2010:Morrissey S:the:economy:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000157</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000157</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000157</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Morrissey, Sheila" sort="Morrissey, Sheila" uniqKey="Morrissey S" first="Sheila" last="Morrissey">Sheila Morrissey</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Library Hi Tech</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0737-8831</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2010-06-15">2010-06-15</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">28</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="211">211</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="223">223</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0737-8831</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0737-8831</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic resources</term>
<term>Accessing software</term>
<term>Artifact</term>
<term>Best guarantor</term>
<term>Careful assessment</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Computer science</term>
<term>Considerable cost savings</term>
<term>Corporate sponsors</term>
<term>Development environment</term>
<term>Different tool</term>
<term>Digital</term>
<term>Digital artifact</term>
<term>Digital heritage</term>
<term>Digital preservation</term>
<term>Digital preservation community</term>
<term>Digital preservation service</term>
<term>Digital preservation space</term>
<term>Digital stewardship</term>
<term>Domain knowledge</term>
<term>Economical solution</term>
<term>Effective knowledge</term>
<term>English literature</term>
<term>Feature extraction</term>
<term>Foss</term>
<term>Foss tool</term>
<term>Foss tools</term>
<term>Free software</term>
<term>Free software foundation</term>
<term>Harvard business school</term>
<term>Individual foss tool</term>
<term>Ithaka</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>Jhove2</term>
<term>Jhove2 framework</term>
<term>Jhove2 project</term>
<term>Linux</term>
<term>Linux foundation</term>
<term>Markup language</term>
<term>Network effect</term>
<term>Open software</term>
<term>Open source</term>
<term>Open source community</term>
<term>Open source initiative</term>
<term>Open source software</term>
<term>Open source software tools</term>
<term>Particular obligation</term>
<term>Portico</term>
<term>Preservation arsenal</term>
<term>Proprietary</term>
<term>Proprietary software</term>
<term>Proprietary tools</term>
<term>Research output report</term>
<term>Revenue models</term>
<term>Sgml</term>
<term>Sgml applications</term>
<term>Software</term>
<term>Software developers</term>
<term>Software engineering</term>
<term>Software tools</term>
<term>Source code</term>
<term>Sustainability</term>
<term>Tribal knowledge</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Purpose Free and open source software FOSS brings many benefits to digital preservation however it is not free. If the context in which free and open source software tools are created and employed is examined, it becomes clear that the sustainability of any software FOSS, custom or commercial to ensure the preservation of the digital heritage will depend on careful assessment of, and provision for, the costs implicit and explicit entailed in the production and continued employment of these tools. The purpose of this paper is to focus on FOSS and archiving of the digital heritage. Designmethodologyapproach Portico, a notforprofit digital preservation service, explores the costs of FOSS based on its experiences as a working archive with an extremely long time horizon. Findings There are considerable benefits to FOSS, including its openness and the broadbased testing of it in realworld situations. FOSS tools can provide considerable cost savings over proprietary tools. However, FOSS is neither free to use, nor to create, nor to maintain. Digital preservation organizations must inventory not only the FOSS tools in the preservation arsenal, but the network of sustaining tools FOSS and otherwise, documentation, and tribal knowledge that make these tools effectively usable. The risks to sustainability of this network of resources must be assessed, and determine what it will cost to keep them viable. Strategies will have to be considered and implemented for providing the means to sustain these resources. An engaged community of use is the best guarantor of the vitality of any FOSS tool. As that community wanes, it becomes even more essential to capture the significant properties and domain knowledge about that tool. Creators of new software in the digital preservation space have a particular obligation to provide and maintain information about the significant properties of that software. Originalityvalue The paper shows how Portico brings its practical experiences integrating multiple FOSS tools to bear on an analysis of the costs to creating and maintaining these tools over the longterm.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Morrissey, Sheila" sort="Morrissey, Sheila" uniqKey="Morrissey S" first="Sheila" last="Morrissey">Sheila Morrissey</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Informatique/explor/SgmlV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Informatique |area= SgmlV1 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:50E7A30D477D7ACEFE0AAC32B3972687C734A577 |texte= The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |